Khadi connotes the beginning of economic freedom and equality of all in the
country. It must be taken with all its implications. It means a wholesale
Swadeshi mentality, a determination to find all the necessaries of life in
India and that too through the labour and intellect of the villagers. The
latter will be largely self-contained and will voluntarily serve the cities
of India and even the outside world in so far as it benefits both the
This needs a revolutionary change in the mentality and tastes of many. Easy
though the non-violent way is in many respects, it is very difficult in many
others. It vitally touches the life of every single Indian, makes him feel
aglow with the possession of a power that has lain hidden within himself,
and makes him proud of his identity with every drop of the ocean of Indian humanity.
Khadi to me is the symbol of unity of Indian humanity, of its economic
freedom and equality and, therefore, ultimately in the poetic expression of
Jawaharlal Nehru, 'the livery of India's freedom'.
Moreover, Khadi mentality means decentralization of the production and
distribution of the necessaries of life. Therefore, the formula so far
evolved is, every village to produce all its necessaries and a certain
percentage in addition for the requirements of the cities.
Having explained the implications of Khadi, I must indicate what Congressmen
can and should do towards its promotion. Production of Khadi includes cotton
growing, picking, ginning, cleaning, carding, slivering, spinning, sizing,
dyeing, prepar-ing the warp and the woof, weaving, and washing. These, with
the exception of dyeing, are essential processes. Every one of them can be
effectively handled in the villages and is being so handled in many villages
throughout India which the A. I. S. A. is covering.
If Congressmen will be true to their Congress call in respect of Khadi, they
will carry out the instructions of the A. I. S. A. issued from time to time
as to the part they can play in Khadi planning. Only a few broad rules can
be laid down here:
family with a plot of ground can grow cotton at least for family use. Cotton
growing is an easy process. In Bihar the cultivators were by law compelled
to grow indigo one of their cultivable land. This was in the interest of the
foreign indigo planter. Why cannot we grow cotton voluntarily for the nation
on a certain portion of our land ? The reader will note that
decentralization commences from the beginning of the Khadi processes. Today
cotton crop is centralized and has to be sent to dis-tant parts of India.
Before the war it used to be sent principally to Britain and Japan. It was
and still is a money crop and, therefore, subject to the fluctua-tions of
the market. Under the Khadi scheme cotton growing becomes free from this
uncertainty and gamble. The grower grows what he needs. The farmer needs to
know that his first business is to grow for his own needs. When he does
that, he will reduce the chance of a low market ruining him.
spinner would buy—if he has not his own—enough cotton for ginning, which he
can easily do without the hand-ginning roller frame. He can gin his own
portion with a board and an iron rolling pin. Where this is considered
impracticable, hand-ginned cotton should be bought and carded. Carding for
self can be done well on a tiny bow without much effort. The greater the
decentralization of labour, the simpler and cheaper the tools. The livers
made, the process of spinning commences.
Imagine the unifying and educative effect of the whole nation simultaneously
taking part in the processes up to spinning! Consider the levelling effect
of the bond of common labour between the rich and the poor!
If Congressmen will put their heart into the work, they will make
improvements in the tools and make many discoveries. In our country there
has been a divorce between labour and intelligence. The result has been
stagnation. If there is an indis-soluble marriage between the two, and that
in the manner here suggested, the resultant good will be inestimable.
In this scheme Of nation-wide spinning as a sacrifice, I do not expect the
average man or woman to give more than one hour daily to this work.
Constructive Programme, 1951, p.11-14
The message of the spinning wheel is much wider than its circumference. Its
message is one of simplicity, service of mankind, living so as not to hurt
others, creating an indissoluble bond between the rich and the poor, capital
and labour, the prince and the peasant.
Y.I., 17-9-'25, p.321
I stand by what is implied in the phrase, 'unto this last'. We must do even
unto this last as we would have the world do by us. All must have equal
opportu-nity. Given the opportunity, every human being has the same
possibility for spiritual growth. That is what the spinning wheel
H., 17-11-'46, p.404
I can only think of spinning as the fittest and most acceptable sacrificial
body labour. I cannot imagine anything nobler or more national than that
for, say one hour in the day, we should all do the labour that the poor must
do, and thus identify ourselves with them and through them with all mankind.
I cannot imagine better worship of God than that in His name I should labour
for the poor even as they do. The spinning wheel spells a more equitable
distribution of the riches of the earth.
Y.I., 20-10-'21, p.329
I feel convinced that the revival of hand-spin-ning and hand-weaving will
make the largest contri-bution to the economic and the moral regeneration of
India. The millions must have a simple industry to supplement agriculture.
Spinning was the cottage industry years ago, and if the millions are to be
saved from starvation, they must be enabled to reintroduce spinning in their
homes and every village must re-possess its own weaver.
Y.I., 21-7-'20, p.4
If the reader would visualize the picture of the Indian skeleton, he must
think of the eighty per cent of the population which is working its own
fields, and which has practically no occupation for at least four months in
the year, and which therefore lives on the borderland of starvation. This is
the normal condition. The ever recurring famines make a large addition to
this enforced idleness. What is the work that these men and women can easily
do in their own cottages so as to supplement their very slender resources?
Does anyone still doubt that it is only hand-spinning and nothing else?
Y.I., 3-11-'21, p.350
Cottage manufacture of yarn and cloth cannot be expensive even as domestic
cookery is not expensive and cannot be replaced by hotel cookery. Over
twenty-five crores of the population will be doing their own hand-spinning
and having yarn thus manu-factured woven in neighbouring localities. This
popu-lation is rooted to the soil, and has at least four months in the year
to remain idle.
If they spin during those hours and have the yarn woven and wear it, no
mill-made cloth can compete with their Khadi. The cloth thus manufac-tured
will be the cheapest possible for them.
Y.I., 8-12-'21, p.405
What is claimed for spinning is that:
1. It supplies the readiest occupation to those who have leisure and are in want of a few coppers;
2. it is known to the thousands;
3. it is easily learnt;
4. it requires practically no outlay of capital;
5. the wheel can be easily and cheaply made. Most of us do not yet know that
spinning can be done even with a piece of tile and splinter;
6. the people have no repugnance to it;
7. it affords immediate relief in times of famine and scarcity;
8. it alone can stop the drain of wealth which goes outside India in the purchase
of foreign cloth;
9. it automatically distributes the millions thus saved among the deserving poor;
10. even the smallest success means so much immediate gain to the people;
11. it is the most potent instrument of secur-ing co-operation among the people.
Y.I., 21-8-'24, p.277
The disease of the masses is not want of money so much as it is want of
work. Labour is money. He, who provides dignified labour for the millions in
their cottages, provides food and clothing, or which is the same thing,
money. The Charkha provides such labour. Till a better substitute is found,
it must, therefore, hold the field.
Y.I., 18-6-'25, p.211
Idleness is the great cause, the root of all evil, and if that root can be
destroyed, most of the evils can be remedied without further effort. A
nation that is starving has little hope or initiative left in it. It becomes
indifferent to filth and disease. It says of all reforms, 'to what good?'
That winter of despair can only be turned into the 'sun-shine of hope' for
the millions only through the life-giving wheel, the Charkha.
Y.I., 27-8-'25, p.299
The spinning wheel is an attempt to produce something out of nothing. If we
save sixty crores of rupees to the nation through the spinning wheel, as we
certainly can, we add that vast amount to the national income. In the
process we automatically organize our villages. And as almost the whole of
the amount must be distributed amongst the poorest of the land, it becomes a
scheme of just and nearly equal distribution of so much wealth. Add to this
immense moral value of such distribution, and the case for the Charkha
Y.I., 17-2-'27, p.52
Indeed, in some places, there are to be found weavers who are classed as
untouchables on account of their occupation. They are mostly weavers of
coarsest Khadi without any pattern. This class was fast dying out when Khadi
came to the rescue and there was created a demand for their coarse
manufac-ture. It was then discovered that there were numerous Harijan
families that even subsisted on spinning. Thus Khadi is doubly the poor
man's staff of life. It helps the poorest, including the Harijans, who are
the most helpless among the poorest. They are so because many occupations
which are available to the others are not available to the Harijans.
H., 27-4-'34, p.85
To those also who aspire to observe Brahmcharya I present the spinning
wheel. It is not a thing to be despised, for it is experience here that
speaks. A person who wants to subdue his passions has need to be calm. All
commotion within him ought to cease; and so quiet and gentle is the motion
of the spinning wheel that it has been known to still the passions of those
who have turned it in the fullness of faith. . . . Human passions are
fleeter even than the wind, and to subdue them completely requires no end of
patience. All that I claim is that in the spinning wheel they will find a
powerful means of culti-vating steadiness.
Y.I., 27-5-'4-26, p.190
Spinning would spell the organization of crores into a joint co-operative
effort, the conservation and utilization of the energy of the millions, and
the dedi-cation of crores of lives to the service of the mother-land. The
carrying out of such a gigantic task would, further, give us a realization
of our own strength. It would mean our acquiring a thorough mastery of the
detail and innumerable knotty problems which it presents, e.g. learning to
keep account of every pie, learning to live in the villages in sanitary and
healthy conditions, removing the difficulties that block the way and so on.
For, unless we learn all this, we would not be able to accomplish this task.
The spinning wheel, then, provides us with a means for generating this
capacity in us.
Y.I., 27-5-'26, p.190
The only universal industry for the millions is spinning and ho other. That
does not mean that other industries do not matter or are useless. Indeed
from the individual standpoint any other industry would be more remunerative
than spinning. Watch-making will be no doubt a most remunerative and
fascinating industry. But how many can engage in it? Is it of any use to the
millions of villagers? But if the villagers can reconstruct their home,
begin to live again as their forefathers did, if they begin to make good use
of their idle hours, all else, all the other industries will revive as a
matter of course.
Y.I., 30-9-'26, p.341
The revival (of Charkha) cannot take place with-out an army of selfless Indians
of intelligence and patriotism working with a single mind in the vil-lages
to spread the message of the Charkha and bring a ray of hope and light into
their lustreless eyes. This is mighty effort at co-operation and adult
education of the correct type. It brings about a silent and sure revolution
like the silent but sure and life-giving revolution of the Charkha.
Twenty years' experience of Charkha work has convinced me of the correctness
of the argument here advanced by me. The Charkha has served the poor Muslims
and Hindus in almost an equal measure. Nearly five crores of rupees have
been put into the pockets of these lakhs of village artisans without fuss
Hence I say without hesitation that the Charkha must lead us to Swaraj in
terms of the masses belong-ing to all faiths. The Charkha restores the
villages to their rightful place and abolishes distinctions bet-ween high
H., 13-4-'40, p.85
The spinning wheel is a symbol not of commercial war but of commercial
peace. It bears not a message of ill-will towards the nations of the earth
but of goodwill and self-help. It will not need the protection of a navy
threatening a world's peace and exploiting its resources, but it needs the
religious determination of millions to spin their yarn in their own homes as
today they cook their food in their own homes. I may deserve the curses of
posterity for many mistakes of omission and commission, but I am confident
of earning its blessings for suggesting a revival of the Charkha. I take my
all on it. For every revolu-tion of the wheel spins peace, goodwill and
Y.I., 8-12-'21, p.406
It is my claim that (by reviving Khadi and other village industries) we
shall have evolved so far that we shall remodel national life in keeping
with the ideal of simplicity and domesticity implanted in the bosom of the
masses. We will not then be dragged into an imperialism which is built upon
exploitation of the weaker races of the earth, and the acceptance of a giddy
materialistic civilization protected by naval and air forces that have made
peaceful living almost impossible. On the contrary we shall then refine that
imperialism into a commonwealth of nations which will combine, if they do,
for the purpose of giving their best to the world and of protecting, not by
brute force but by self-suffering, the weaker na-tions or races of the
earth. Such a transformation can come only after the complete success of the
spin-ning wheel. India can become fit for delivering such a message, when
she has become proof against tempta-tion and therefore attacks from outside,
by becoming self-contained regarding two of her chief needs— food and
Y.I., 29-6-'21, p.206
When once we have revived the one industry (Khadi), all the other industries
will follow. I would make the spinning wheel the foundation on which to
build a sound village life; I would make the wheel the centre round which
all other activities will revolve.
Y.I., 21-5-'25, p.177
The ideal of Khadi has always been as a means, par excellence, for
the resuscitation of villages and there-through the generation of real
strength among the masses—the strength that will ipso facto bring
Swaraj through Charkha 1945, p.8
My experience tells me that in order to make Khadi universal both in ' the
cities and villages, it should be made available only in exchange for yarn.
As time passes I hope people will themselves insist on buying Khadi through
yarn currency. If, however, this does not happen and they produce yarn
grudgingly, I fear Swaraj through non-violence will be impossible.
An increase in the number of mills and cities will certainly not contribute
to the prosperity of India's millions. On the contrary, it will bring
further poverty to the unemployed and all the diseases that follow in the
wake of starvation. If town-dwellers can look upon such a spectacle with
equanimity there is nothing more to be said. In such an event it will be the
reign of violence in India, not a reign of Truth and Ahimsa. And we shall be
forced to admit that there is naturally no room there for Khadi. Mili-tary
training will then have to be compulsory for all. But we must only think in
terms of the starving crores. If they are to be restored, if they are to
live, then the Charkha must be made the central activity and people must
Swaraj through Charkha 1945, p.5
Our work had a very humble beginning. When I started Khadi I had with me,
apart from Maganlalbhai and others who had elected to live and die with me,
Vitthaldasbhai and a few sisters. We have travelled a long way since then
and today about two crores of people have come under the influence of the
Charkha. By its help we have been able to provide the village people with a
large amount of money. But can we still hold, as we have always maintained,
that Swaraj is impossible without the Charkha? So long as we do not
substantiate this claim the Charkha is really no more than a measure of
relief, to which we turn because we can do nothing else about it. It would
not then be the means of our salvation.
Secondly, we have failed to carry our message to the crores of our people.
They have neither any know-ledge of what the Charkha can do for them nor
even the necessary curiosity for it.
The Congress did accept the Charkha. But did it do so willingly? No, it
tolerates the Charkha simply for my sake. The Socialists ridicule it
outright. They have spoken and written much against it. We have no clear or
convincing reply to offer to them. How I wish I could convince them that the
Charkha is the key to Swaraj! I have not been able to justify the claim all
Now for my third point: Non-violence is not something of the other world.
If it is, I have no use for it. I am of the earth and if non-violence is
something really worthwhile I want to realize it here on this earth while
still I am alive. And how else can it be realized except in a society which
has compassion and other similar virtues as its characteristics?
If you go to the house of one who has use for violence you will find his
drawing room decorated with tigers' skins, deers' horns, swords, guns and
such like. I have been to the Viceregal Lodge, I also saw Mussolini. In the
houses of both I found arms hang-ing on the walls. I was given a salute with
arms, a symbol of violence.
Just as arms symbolize violence the Charkha symbolizes non-violence, in the
sense that we can most directly realize non-violence through it. But it
cannot symbolize non-violence so long as we do not work in accordance with
its spirit. The sword in Mussolini's hall seemed to say "Touch me and I will
cut you." It gave a vivid picture of violence. It seemed to ask you to touch
it and realize its power. So also we must illustrate the power of the
Charkha so that a mere look at it may speak to us about non-violence. But we
are bankrupt today. What is our answer to Socialists? They complain that we
have been harping on the Charkha for years and yet we have achieved nothing.
The Charkha was there during Muslim rule also. Dacca was famous for its
muslins. The Charkha then was a symbol of poverty and not of non-violence.
The kings took forced labour from women and depressed classes. The same was
later repeated by the East India Company. Kautilya mentions in his
Arthashastra the existence of such forced labour. For ages the Charkha
was thus a symbol of violence and the use of force and compulsion. The
spinner got but a handful of grain or two small coins, while ladies of the
court went about luxuriously clad in the finest of muslins, the product of exploited labour.
As against this, I have presented the Charkha to you as a symbol of
non-violence. If I did not make it clear to you so far, it was my mistake.
You know I am among the maimed and can move but slowly. Yet I do believe
that the work done so far has not been a waste.
I shall now pass to my fourth point. We have not yet proved that there can
be no Swaraj without the Charkha. It cannot be proved so long as you do not
explain it to Congressmen. The Charkha and the Congress should become synonyms.
The task of proving the superiority of non-violence is a difficult one. We
have to fathom its depths if we are to realize its truth. The world is going
to put me to the test. It may declare me a fool for my tall talk about the
Charkha. The task of making the Charkha, which for centuries had been a
symbol of poverty, helplessness, injustice and forced labour, the symbol now
of mighty non-violent strength, of the new social order and of the new
economy, has fallen on our shoulders. We have to change history. And I want
to do it through you.
I hope you follow what I am saying. But if in spite of it you do not believe
that the Charkha has the power to achieve Swaraj, I will ask you to leave
me. Here you are at the cross roads. If you continue with me without faith
you will be deceiving me and doing a great wrong to the country. I beg of
you not to deceive me in the evening of my life.
It is- I who am responsible for defects in our working so far. The fault is
mine because I have remained the head even when I was conscious of its
defects. But let bygones be bygones. Do we honestly believe today that the
Charkha is the emblem of non-violence? How many of us are there who believe
so from the depths of our heart?
Now we have the tri-colour flag. What is it but a piece of Khadi of specific
length and breadth? You can well have another piece in its place. But behind
that Khadi cloth lie encased your feelings. It is a symbol of Swaraj, a
symbol of national emancipation. We cannot forget it. We will not remove it.
We are prepared to die for it. So also the Charkha should be an emblem of
What does the Charkha, as an emblem of non-violence, signify in the economic
sphere? Call it self-sufficiency or what you like. In the name of national
reconstruction and self-sufficiency millions are being bled white in Western
countries, as also in other countries for their sake. Ours is not a
self-sufficiency of that pattern. The Charkha is the way to get rid of
exploitation and domination. I am not so much concerned with words as with
the thing itself.
We are familiar with the controversy in our religion as to whether God has a
form or no. The believers in form prefer to worship God through an emblem.
So if non-violence is to be pursued as an ideal, the Charkha must be
acknowledged as its true form and emblem, and kept ever before view.
When-ever I think of non-violence the picture of the Charkha comes before
me. We cannot visualize non-violence in the abstract. So we choose an object
which can symbolize for us the formless. That is what the Charkha does for
me and that is why I worship it. Unless you understand and imbibe this
spirit behind my worship of the Charkha you will not gain an understanding
of non-violence even for a hundred years. That capacity for non-violence
which I find in the Charkha can also be perceived by you only if you
approach it with a heart like mine. That is why I say: Follow me or leave
me. If you want to come with me I will give you a scheme and do everything
possible. If you have not understood what I mean I am prepared to sit and
discuss it with you the whole day. But if you say that you have grasped my
meaning when you really have not, you will be deceiving both yourselves and
me. Ours is not an Association for making profit. We do not seek loaves and
fishes. There are a thousand fields in which we can serve the country. Why
then remain in Charkha work and sail under false colours? Please do not
therefore remain with me under an illusion. Let me go my way alone. But if
it were found that I was myself suffering from an illusion and that my
belief in the Charkha was mere idol-worship, either you may burn me to ashes
with the wood of the Charkha, or I myself would set fire to the Charkha
with my own hand.
If the Charkha Sangh has to go, let us wind it up with our own hands. That
will put an end to all our struggle. Then the Charkha which has for the
moment put us into a labyrinth of difficulties will be left in the hands of
a few who believe in it, and may in their hands prove to be a mighty weapon.
If you regard it as sheer folly I certainly have no ambition to run an
idiots' association and thus degrade the country. On the other hand, if you
can manifest non-violence through the Charkha, it will not merely move but
sweep forward. You will not then have to worry about keeping it alive.
I repeat that you either leave me alone or digest what I say and follow me.
I have brought this new idea to you after two years of penitential thinking.
I do not know if I have succeeded in conveying my idea to you. If I have
been able to carry conviction please do one thing. Those of you who want to
remain with me give me in writing that you regard the Charkha from today as
the emblem of non-violence. You have to make your decision today. If you do
not or cannot regard the Charkha as the emblem of non-violence and yet you
remain with me, then you will thereby put yourself in an awkward plight and
also drag me down with you.
Khadi – Why and How, 1959, p.153-57
One epoch of Khadi has ended. Khadi has achieved something for the benefit
of the poor. Now we have to demonstrate how the poor can be self-supporting.
Ideology of the Charkha 1959, p.94
I saw that our work would be incomplete, so long as we did not carry the
message of the Charkha to every home.
Khadi – Why and How, 1959, p.149
The Charkha is the symbol of non-violent economic self-sufficiency. If we
and the people grasp this significance of the Charkha not a pice need be
spent on propaganda for the Charkha. Nor need we look to the rich for alms.
We shall without effort become the centre of hope, and the people will come
to us of their own accord. They will not go elsewhere to seek work. Every
village will become the nerve centre of independent India. India will then
not be known by her cities like Bombay and Calcutta, but by her 400 millions
inhabiting the seven lakhs of villages. The problems of Hindu-Muslim
differences, untouchability, conflicts, misunderstandings and rival-ries
will all melt away. This is the real function of the Sangh. We have to live
and die for it.
Khadi – Why and How, 1959, p.150
The pursuit of the Charkha must become the mainspring of manifold other
activities like village industries, Nai Talim etc. If we are able to adopt
the Charkha intelligently we can revive the entire economic life of our
villages once more.
Khadi – Why and How, 1959, p.151
By its help we have been able to provide the village people with a large
amount of money. But can we still hold, as we have always maintained, that
Swaraj is impossible without the Charkha? So long as we do not substantiate
this claim the Charkha is really no more than a measure of relief, to which
we turn because we can do nothing else about it. It would not then be the
means of our salvation.
Khadi – Why and How, 1959, p.154
Now I feel that Khadi alone cannot revive the villages. Village uplift is
possible only when we re-juvenate village life as a whole, revive all
village industries and make the entire village industrious.
Khadi – Why and How, 1959, p.181
Khadi is not an occupation or draft merely to earn a livelihood. None of us
should harbour this idea.
Khadi – Why and How, 1959, p.184
Our reason for putting forward Khadi is that it is the only way to redeem
the people from the disease of inertia and indifference, the only way to
generate in them the strength for freedom. If other crafts are also thus
revitalized, our villages could be made self-sufficient and self-reliant.
Khadi – Why and How, 1959, p.185
But what we are required to prove above all is the necessity for Khadi for
establishing a strong, non-violent village economy.
Khadi – Why and How, 1959, p.189
In my opinion, however, the real celebration (of Charkha Jayanti) will come
only when the music of the wheel which is the symbol of Independence and
non-violence will be heard in every home. If a few or even a crore of poor
women spin in order to earn a pittance, what can the celebration mean to
them and what achievement can that be? This can well happen even under a
despotic rule and is today visible, wherever capital holds sway.
Millionaires are sustained by the charity, they dole out to the poor, may be
even in. the form of wages.
The celebration will only be truly worth-while when the rich and the poor
alike understand that all are equal in the eyes of God, that each one, in
his own place, must earn his bread by labour, and that the independence of
all will be protected, not by guns and ammunition but by the bullets, in the
shape of cones of hand-spun yarn, i.e. not by violence but by non-violence.
H., 22-9-'46, p.320
Ponder and realize what wealth this would mean to India, if 300 crores worth
of cloth are produced by their own hands in the villages. This is a
verit-able mint of gold for them and if Khadi became universal, the villages
would rise to unknown heights.
Today our masses are poverty-stricken, without the lustre of hope or
intelligence in their eyes. The pure hands of the spinners could create this
miracle for them and everyone could help. They should have understanding
hearts and seeing eyes to detect the beauty in Khaddar even if it is coarse
and not be allured by mill finery which could never clothe their nakedness
in the true sense of the term. The only way to clothe their nakedness and
drive away hunger is for them to grow their own food and make their own
cloth. If this happy consummation could be achieved, the eyes of the whole
world would be turned towards India,.
H., 22-9-'46, p.322
Before the Charkha class in full swing, everything else appears dull and
lifeless to me. For I behold my Rama dancing in every thread drawn. I find
Swaraj in it. When I contemplate the strength of the yarn drawn by 40 crores
of hands, my heart is filled with an ecstasy of joy. 'O, but 20 crores of
Indians will not take to spinning,' you say. Is it not a sign of our
ignorance and lack of faith to refuse to believe in the possibility? Is it
an impossible thing to expect every one of half, the population to spin for
an hour a day? If we have not the capacity to sacrifice even this much for
our Motherland, what is our love of country worth?
H., 22-9-'46, p.322