Mr. Stokes approves of non-co-operation, but dreads the consequences that may follow complete success, i.e. evacuation of India by the British. He conjures up before his mind a picture of India invaded by the Afghans from the North-West, plundered by the Gurkhas from the Hills. For me I say with Cardinal Newman: 'I do not ask to see the distant scene; one step enough for me.' The movement is essentially religious. The business of every god-fearing man is to dissociate himself from evil in total disregard of consequences. He must have faith in a good deed produc-ing only a good result: that, in my opinion, is the Gita doctrine of work without attachment. God does not permit him to peep into the future. He follows truth although the following of it may endanger his very life. He knows that it is better to die in the way of God than to live in the way of Satan. Therefore, whoever is satisfied that the Government represents the activity of Satan has no choice left to him but to dissociate himself from it.
However, let us consider the worst that can happen to India on a sudden evacuation of
India by the British. What does it matter that the Gurkhas and the Pathans
attack us? Surely we would be better able to deal with their violence than we
are with the continued violence, moral and physical, perpetrated by the present
Government. Mr. Stokes does not seem to eschew the use of physical force. Surely
the combined labour of the Rajput, the Sikh and the Mussalman warriors in a
united India may be trusted to deal with plunderers from any or all the sides.
Imagine, however, the worst: Japan overwhelming us from the Bay of Bengal, the
Gurkhas from the Hills, and the Pathans from the North-West. If we do not
succeed in driving them out, we make terms with them, and drive them out at the
first opportunity. This will be a more manly course than a helpless submission
to an admittedly wrong-ful state.
refuse to contemplate the dismal outlook. If the movement succeeds through
non-violent non-co-opera-tion — and that is the supposition Mr. Stokes has
started with — the English, whether they remain or retire, will do so as friends
and under a well-ordered agreement as between partners. I still believe in the
goodness of human nature, whether it is English or any other. I therefore do not
believe that the English will leave in ' a night.
And do I
consider the Gurkha and the Afghan being incorrigible thieves and robbers
without ability to respond to purifying influences? I do not. If India returns
to her spirituality; it will react upon the neighbouring tribes; she will
interest herself in the welfare of these hardy but poor people, and even support
them, if necessary, not out of fear but as a matter of neighbourly duty. She
will have dealt with Japan simultaneously with the British. Japan will not want
to invade India, if India has learnt to consider it a sin to use a single
foreign article that she can manufa-cture within her own borders. She produces
enough to eat, and her men and women can, without difficulty, manufacture enough
cloth to cover their nakedness and protect themselves from heat and cold. We
become prey to inva-sion, if we excite the greed of foreign nations by ealing
with them under a feeling of dependence on them. We must learn to be independent
of every one of them.