Back | Next


02. At School

I passed my childhood in Porbandar. I remember having been put to school. It was with some difficulty that I got through the multiplication tables. I recollect nothing more of those days than having learnt, in  company with other boys, to call our teacher all kinds of names.

I must have been about seven when my father left Porbandar for Rajkot. There I was put into a primary school, and I can well re- member those days. As at Porbandar, so here, there is hardly anything to note about my studies.

From this school I went to the sub- urban  school  and  thence  to  the high school, having already reached my twelfth year. I do not remember having ever told a lie, during this short period, either to my teachers or to my schoolmates. I used to be very shy and avoided all company. My books and my lessons were my sole companions. To be at school at the stroke of the hour and to run back home as soon as the school closed,–that was my daily habit. I literally ran back, because I could not bear to talk to anybody.  I  was  even  afraid  lest anyone should poke fun at me.

There is an incident which occurred at the examination during my first year at the high school and which is worth recording. Mr. Giles,  the  Educational  Inspector, had come on a visit of inspection. He had set us five words to write as a spelling exercise. One of the words was ‘kettle’. I had misspell it. The teacher tried to prompt me with the point of his boot, but I would not be prompted. It was be- yond me to see that he wanted me to copy the spelling from my neighbour’s slate, for I had thought that the teacher was there to super- vise us against copying. The result was that all the boys, except my- self, were found to have spelt every  word  correctly.  Only  I  had been stupid. The teacher tried later to tellmethatIshouldnothave been so stupid, but without effect. I never could learn the art of ‘copying’.

Yet the incident did not in the least lessen my respect for my teacher. I was, by nature, blind to the faults of elders. Later I came to know  of  many  other  failings  of this teacher, but my regard for him remained the same. For I had learnt to carry out the orders of elders, not to look critically at their actions.

Two other incidents belonging to the same period have always clung to my memory. As a rule I did not like any reading beyond my school books. The daily lessons had to be done, because I did not want to be taken to task by my teacher, nor to deceive him. Therefore, I would do the lessons, but often without my mind in them. Thus when even the lessons could not be done properly, there was of course no question of any  extra reading.  But  somehow my eyes fell on a book purchased by my father. It was Shravana* Pitribhakti Nataka (a play about Shravana’s devotion to his parents). I read it with intense interest. There came to our place about the same time wandering show- men. One of the pictures I was shownwasofShravanacarrying, by means of slings fitted for his shoulders, his blind parents on a pilgrimage. The book and the picture left a permanent impression on my mind. “Here is an example for you to copy,” I said to myself.

Just about this time, I had se- cured  my  father’s  permission  to see a play performed by a certain dramatic company. This play – Harishchandra+ – captured my heart. I could never be tired of seeing it. But how often should I be permitted to go? I kept thinking aboutitallthetimeandImust have actedHarishchandratomy- self times without number. “Why should not all be truthful like Harishchandra ?” was the question I asked myself day and night. To follow truth and to go through all the ordeals Harishchandra went through was the one ideal it in- spired in me. I literally believed in the story of Harishchandra. The thought of it all often made me weep.

I was not regarded as a dunce at the high school. I always enjoyed the affection of my teachers. Certificates of progress and character used to be sent to the parents ev- ery year. I never had a bad certificate. In fact I even won prizes after I passed out of the second standard. In the fifth and sixth I obtained scholarships of rupees four and ten respectively, an achievementforwhichIhaveto thank good luck more than my merit. For the scholarships were not open to all, but reserved for the best boys amongst those coming from the Sorath Division of Kathiawad. And in those days there could not have been many boys from Sorath in a class of forty to fifty.

My  own  recollection  is  that  I had not any high regard for my ability. I used to be astonished whenever I won prizes and scholarships.ButIveryjealously guarded my character. The least little  fault  drew  tears  from  my eyes.WhenImerited,orseemed to the teacher to merit, a rebuke, it wasunbearablefor me.Iremember having once received a beating. I did not so much mind the punishment, as the fact that it was considered my deserts. I wept piteously. That was when I was in the first or second standard. There was another such incident during the time when I was in the seventh standard. Dorabji Edulji Gimi was the headmaster then. He was popular among boys, as he was a disciplinarian, a man of method and a good teacher. He had made gymnastics and cricket compulsory for boys of the upper standards. I dis-liked both. I never took part in any exercise, cricket or football, before they were made compulsory. My shyness was one of the reasons for this  aloofness,  which  I  now  see was wrong. I then had the false notion that gymnastics had nothing to do with education.

I may mention, however, that I was none the worse for keeping away from exercise. That was be- causeIhad readinbooksabout the benefits of long walks in the open air, and having liked the ad- vice, I had formed a habit of taking walks, which has still remained with me. These walks gave me a fairly hardy constitution.

The reason of my dislike for gymnastics was my keen desire to serve  as  nurse  to  my  father.  As soon as the school closed, I would hurry home and begin serving him. Compulsory exercise came directly in the way of this service. I re- quested Mr. Gimi to exempt me from gymnastics so that I might be free to serve my father. But he would not listen to me. Now it so happened that one Saturday, when wehadschoolinthemorning,I had to go from home to the school for gymnastics at 4 o'clock in the afternoon. I had no watch, and the clouds deceived me. Before I reached the school the boys had all left. The next day Mr. Gimi, examining the roll, found me marked absent. Being asked the reason for absence, I told him what had happened.Herefusedto believeme andorderedmetopayafineof one or two annas (I cannot now recall how much).

I was convicted of lying ! That deeply pained me. How was I to provemyinnocence?Therewas no way. I cried in deep anguish. I saw that a man of truth must also beamanofcare.Thiswasthe first and last instance of my carelessness in school. I have a faint recollection that I finally succeeded in getting the fine refunded. The exemption from exercise was of courseobtained,asmyfather wrote himself to the headmaster saying that he wanted me at home after school.

But though I was none the worse for having neglected exercise, I am still paying the penalty of another neglect. I do not know whence I got the notion that good handwriting  was  not  a  necessary part of education, but I retained it until I went to England. Bad hand- writing  should  be  regarded  as  a sign of an imperfect education. I tried later to improve mine, but it was too late. I could never repair the neglect of my youth.

Two more incidents of my school days are worth recording. I had lost one year because of my marriage,  and  the  teacher  wanted me to make good the loss by skip- ping the class – a privilege usually allowed to hard-working boys. I thereforehad onlysixmonthsin the third standard and was promoted to the fourth after the examinations which are followed by the summer vacation. Most subjects were taught in English from the fourth standard. I found it very hard. Geometry was a new subject in which I was not particularly strong, and the English medium made it still more difficult for me. The teacher taught the subject very well but I could not follow him. Often I would lose heart and think of going back to the third standard, feeling that the packing of two years’  studies  into  a  single  year was too much. But this would dis- credit not only me, but also the teacher; because, counting on my ability, he had recommended my promotion. So the fear of the double  discredit  kept  me  at  my post. When, however, with much effort I reached the thirteenth proposition of Euclid, the utter simplicity of the subject became clear to me. A subject which only required a pure and simple use of one’sreasoningpowerscouldnot be difficult. Ever since that time geometry has been both easy and interesting for me.

Sanskrit, however, proved a harder task. In geometry there was nothing to memorize, whereas in Sanskrit, I thought, everything had to be learnt by heart. This subject also began from the fourth standard. As soon as I entered the sixth I became disheartened. The teacher was a hard task-master, anxious, as I thought, to force the boys. There was a sort of rivalry going on between the Sanskrit and the Persian teachers. The Persian teacher was lenient. The boys used to talk among themselves that Persian was very easy and the Persian teacher very good and considerate to the students. The ‘easiness’ temptedme and one day I sat in the Persian class. the Sanskrit teacher was grieved. He called me tohissideandsaid: “Howcan you forget that you are the son of a Vaishnava father ? Won't you learn the language of your own religion ? If you have any difficulty, why not come to me ? I want to teach you students Sanskrit to the best of my ability. As you proceed further, you will find in it things of great interest. You should not lose heart. Come and sit again in the Sanskrit class.”

This kindness put me to shame. I could not disregard my teacher’s affection. If I had not acquired the little Sanskrit that I learnt then, I should  have  found  it  difficult  to take any interest in our sacred books. In fact I am sorry now that I was not able to acquire a more thorough  knowledge  of  the  language, because I have since realized that every Hindu boy and girl should possess sound Sanskrit learning.