Reader : When you speak of driving out Western civilization, I suppose you will also say that we want no machinery.
Editor : By raising this question, you have opened the wound I have
received. When I read Mr. Dutt's Economic History of India, I
wept; and as I think of it again my heart sickens. It is machinery that
has impoverished India. It is difficult to measure the harm that
Manchester has done to us. It is due to Manchester that Indian
handicraft has all but disappeared.
But I make a mistake. How can Manchester be blamed? We wore Manchester
cloth and this is why Manchester wove it. I was delighted when I read
about the bravery of Bengal. There were no cloth-mills in that
presidency. They were, therefore, able to restore the original hand
weaving occupation. It is true Bengal encourages the mill-industry of
Bombay. If Bengal had proclaimed a boycott of all machine-made goods, it
would have been much better.
Machinery has begun to desolate Europe. Ruination is now knocking at the
English gates, Machinery is the chief symbol of modern civilization; it
represents a great sin.
The workers in the mills of Bombay have become slaves. The condition of
the women working in the mills is shocking. When there were no mills,
these women were not starving. If the machinery craze grows in our
country, it will become an unhappy land. It may be considered a heresy,
but I am bound to say that it were better for us to send money to
Manchester and to use flimsy Manchester cloth than to multiply mills in
India. By using Manchester cloth we only waste our money; but by
reproducing Manchester in India, we shall keep our money at the price of
our blood, because our very moral being will be sapped, and I call in
support of my statement the very mill-hands as witnesses. And those who
have amassed wealth out of factories are not likely to be better than
other rich men. It would be folly to assume that an Indian Rockefeller
would be better than the American Rockefeller. Impoverished India can
become free, but it will be hard for any India made rich through
immorality to regain its freedom. I fear we shall have to admit that
moneyed men support British rule; their interest is bound up with its
stability. Money renders a man helpless. The other thing which is
equally harmful is sexual vice. Both are poison. A snake-bite is a
lesser poison than these two, because the former merely destroys the
body but the latter destroy body, mind and soul. We need not, therefore,
be pleased with the prospect of the growth of the mill-industry.
Reader : Are the mills, then, to be closed down?
Editor : That is difficult. It is no easy task to do away with a thing
that is established. We, therefore, say that the non-beginning of a
thing is supreme wisdom. We cannot condemn mill-owners; we can but pity
them. It would be too much to expect them to give up their mills, but we
may implore them not to increase them. If they would be good they would
gradually contract their business. They can establish in thousands of
households the ancient and sacred handlooms and they can buy out the
cloth that may be thus woven. Whether the mill-owners do this or not,
people can cease to use machine-made goods.
Reader : You have so far spoken about machine- made cloth, but there are
innumerable machine-made things. We have either to import them or to
introduce machinery into our country.
Editor : Indeed, our gods even are made in Germany. What need, then, to
speak of matches, pins and glassware? My answer can be only one. What
did India do before these articles were introduced? Precisely the same
should be done today. As long as we cannot make pins without machinery
so long will we do without them. The tinsel splendour of glassware we
will have nothing to do with, and we will make wicks, as of old, with
home grown cotton and use handmade earthen saucers for lamps. So doing
we shall save our eyes and money and support Swadeshi and so shall we
attain Home Rule.
It is not to be conceived that all men will do all these things at one
time or that some men will give up all machine-made things at once. But,
if the thought is sound, we shall always find out 'what we can give up
and gradually cease to use it. What a few may do, others will copy; and
the movement will grow like the coconut of the mathematical problem.
What the leaders do, the populace will gladly do in turn. The matter is
neither complicated nor difficult. You and I need not wait until we can
carry others with us. Those will be the losers who will not do it, and
those who will not do it, although they appreciate the truth, will
deserve to be called cowards.
Reader : What, then, of the tram-cars and electricity?
Editor : This question is now too late. It signifies nothing. If we are
to do without the railways we shall have to do without the tram-cars.
Machinery is like a snake-hole which may contain from one to a hundred
snakes. Where there is machinery there are large cities; and where there
are large cities, there are tram-cars and railways; and there only does
one see electric light. English villages do not boast of any of these
things. Honest physicians will tell you that where means of artificial
locomotion have increased, the health of the people has suffered. I
remember that when in a European town there was a scarcity of money, the
receipts of the tramway company, of the lawyers and of the doctors went
down and people were less unhealthy. I cannot recall a single good point
in connection with machinery. Books can be written to demonstrate its
Reader : Is it a good point or a bad one that all you are saying will be
printed through machinery?
Editor : This is one of those instances which demonstrate that sometimes
poison is used to kill poison. This, then, will not be a good point
regarding machinery. As it expires, the machinery, as it were, says to
us: "Beware and avoid me. You will derive no benefits from me and the
benefit that may accrue from printing will avail only those who are
infected with the machinery-craze."
Do not, therefore, forget the main thing. It is necessary to realize
that machinery is bad. We shall then be able gradually to do away with
it. Nature has not provided any way whereby we may reach a desired goal
all of a sudden. If, instead of welcoming machinery as a boon, we should
look upon it as an evil, it would ultimately go.